|
From: Ashley P. <as...@pi...> - 2009-08-16 11:30:34
|
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 01:25 +0200, Julian Seward wrote:
> Ashley,
>
> I think you have some good points, esp w.r.t. the tagging when using
> --xml-socket. I see that the lack of it gets in your way.
>
> Can I suggest you open a bug report, to put this stuff on? We're trying
> to use bugzilla more actively, and it'll stop this all getting lost
> otherwise.
Ok, I'll open one.
> > Did you have any thoughts on the other points I mentioned, either
> > getting both sets of output and ideally a way of getting a qualifier in
> > over the --{log,file}-socket options.
>
> Could you show some examples of what you mean? (examples with simple
> bits of XML ?) I think I know what you're getting at, but am not sure.
I'll put something together. Even without using it to try and simplify
the testing it would be useful to be able to reproduce the non xml
output from the xml output.
In the mean time all that's needed from Valgrind is the ability to
output both xml and the standard output simultaneously.
Ashley.
--
Ashley Pittman, Bath, UK.
Padb - A parallel job inspection tool for cluster computing
http://padb.pittman.org.uk
|