Re: [Valgrind-users] Terse description of errors with valgrind 3.4.1

[tom f. <tf...@al...>]

Michel Audette <mic...@ki...> writes:
> See example below. I don't recall details of offending instructions
> being replaced by ??? in the past. Is this a new option that I should
> be setting, or an indication of a spurious error?
> 
> ==27271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
> ==27271==    at 0x187FCEC6: (within /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.180.44)
> ==27271==    by 0x41FF6BF: (within /usr/lib/libGL.so.180.44)
[snip]

Don't valgrind with the nvidia driver, it confuses the hell out of
everything.  If you must, make sure you always use --smc-check=all.  If
you really must, use my attached suppression file.  You should upgrade
your driver first though.

-tom