|
From: tom f. <tf...@al...> - 2009-08-14 00:01:11
|
Michel Audette <mic...@ki...> writes: > See example below. I don't recall details of offending instructions > being replaced by ??? in the past. Is this a new option that I should > be setting, or an indication of a spurious error? > > ==27271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 > ==27271== at 0x187FCEC6: (within /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.180.44) > ==27271== by 0x41FF6BF: (within /usr/lib/libGL.so.180.44) [snip] Don't valgrind with the nvidia driver, it confuses the hell out of everything. If you must, make sure you always use --smc-check=all. If you really must, use my attached suppression file. You should upgrade your driver first though. -tom |