|
From: Nicholas N. <n.n...@gm...> - 2009-08-13 12:50:17
|
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Stuart Warren<de...@ra...> wrote: > Thanks for that Nicholas. I agree with you that the test is working as > documented but it's odd that the mempool code doesn't support leak > checking for destroyed pools. It's not a lot of work to support this, > it's more a matter of how. I still don't understand. If a pool has been destroyed, all the blocks allocated from the pool have been freed. What leak checking is there to do? > I was going to raise a bug and attach the patch. Is that the best way > for a casual contributor to get a change into Valgrind? Yes. See http://www.valgrind.org/support/features.html. Nick |