Re: [Valgrind-users] cachegrind on Darwin

[Nicholas N. <n.n...@gm...>]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Nicholas
Nethercote<n.n...@gm...> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Nicholas
> Nethercote<n.n...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>> I was just looking at this.  It's a tricky case, lstat64_extended()
>> has 4 arguments.  The first two are the same as lstat(), and are easy.
>>  But the last two are pointers, xsecurity and xsecurity_size, and I'm
>> having trouble working out how big are the buffers that they point to.
>>
>> I think xsecurity_size points to a word-sized buffer, and that the
>> value in xsecurity_size is the size of xsecurity, and that
>> xsecurity_size is updated with the number of bytes written
>> (somewhere?) but I'm not completely sure.
>
> I just discovered that stat_extended is already wrapped, so doing
> lstat_extended from that should be easy.

stat_extended, lstat_extended, stat64_extended and lstat64_extended
are now implemented in the SVN trunk.

Thanks for the report.

Nick