|
From: Nicholas N. <n.n...@gm...> - 2009-06-09 22:32:18
|
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Jay Foad<jay...@gm...> wrote: > > On my application, valgrind complained: > > ==27037== Warning: noted but unhandled ioctl 0x500e with no size/direction hints > ==27037== This could cause spurious value errors to appear. > ==27037== See README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL for guidance on > writing a proper wrapper. > > 0x500e is SNDCTL_DSP_NONBLOCK, which doesn't read or write anything, > so does the attached patch look OK? It does. I just committed it as r10284. Thanks. Nick |