Re: [Valgrind-developers] Darwin asm vs Linux asm

[Bart V. A. <bar...@gm...>]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Nicholas Nethercote
<n.n...@gm...> wrote:
> x86/Linux assembly code and x86/Darwin assembly code appear to be
> different dialects.  Some of the tests in none/tests/x86/ and
> memcheck/tests/x86/ compile on x86/Darwin, eg.
> memcheck/tests/bug152022.  But some don't, eg. pushfpopf, because
> x86/Darwin assembler doesn't accept the .type and .size options.
>
> The easiest thing to do is move the ones that don't compile on Darwin
> into an x86-linux/ directory.  Anyone have any strong opinons about
> this, or other insights?

Which standards apply to x86 assembler syntax ?

Bart.