Re: [Valgrind-developers] valgrind: r8944 - branches/DARWIN/memcheck/tests/linux

[Bart V. A. <bar...@gm...>]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
<n.n...@gm...> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Bart Van Assche
> <bar...@gm...> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:25 AM,  <sv...@va...> wrote:
>>> Modified: branches/DARWIN/memcheck/tests/linux/Makefile.am
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- branches/DARWIN/memcheck/tests/linux/Makefile.am    2009-01-13 03:32:52 UTC (rev 8943)
>>> +++ branches/DARWIN/memcheck/tests/linux/Makefile.am    2009-01-13 04:25:04 UTC (rev 8944)
>>> @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
>>>  noinst_SCRIPTS = filter_stderr
>>>
>>>  EXTRA_DIST = $(noinst_SCRIPTS) \
>>> -       linux-capget linux-capget.stderr.exp \
>>> -       linux-timerfd-syscall linux-timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp
>>> +       capget capget.stderr.exp \
>>> +       timerfd-syscall timerfd-syscall.stderr.exp
>>>
>>>  check_PROGRAMS = \
>>> -       linux-capget \
>>> -       linux-timerfd-syscall
>>> +       capget \
>>> +       timerfd-syscall
>>>
>>>  AM_CPPFLAGS  = -I$(top_srcdir)/include
>>>  AM_CFLAGS    = $(WERROR) @FLAG_M32@ -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -g \
>>>
>>> [ ... ]
>>
>> Hello Nicholas,
>>
>> Are you aware that autoconf/automake supports conditional compilation
>> ? You can find an example in drd/tests/Makefile.am, e.g. in the
>> following lines:
>>
>> if HAVE_BOOST_1_35
>> check_PROGRAMS += boost_thread
>> endif
>
> Yes, it's used in lots of our Makefile.am files. But what is the
> relevance for this file?

Sorry, I didn't look closely enough to the diff. I do not understand
why linux-timerfd-syscall.* was renamed into timerfd-syscall.*. AFAIK
the timerfd system call only exists in Linux and not in other kernels
(FreeBSD, Darwin) ?

Bart.