|
From: Sérgio D. J. <ser...@li...> - 2008-11-03 19:23:34
|
Hi guys, I'm sorry for the absence. I was a little busy working with other things here :-). After a few moments thinking about our (long and useful) discussion, I have another question. It has to do with one of my proposals: On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:42 -0200, Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote: > 2) Julian said that detecting locking primitives using only instructions > is too complex, maybe impossible. Well, but as far as I understood, you > are assuming a "general locking primitives detector". What if we limit > this problem only to the locking primitives present in the libgomp? > Would that be easier to do? (Of course it has a down side because every > time the libgomp changed, we would have to change Valgrind too... But I > think it's a valid question anyway) Basically, I'd like to know: if I start to implement this idea, what are the chances for me to have to change something in the VEX "package"? Will I certainly have to modify VEX's source, or only Valgrind's core? I don't know if you guys can answer this, but you certainly are more capable than me. Thanks in advance, -- Sérgio Durigan Júnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil |