From: Julian S. <ju...@va...> - 2008-09-08 12:00:11
|
(this didn't make it to the list the first time) On Monday 08 September 2008, Anton Dudarenko wrote: > Hmm, it helped. BUT in general it is a strange behavior: > Now I got this: > [...] > But in that case (regarding this version of patch) I expected to see this: > [...] Err, I don't understand. Please can you show more precisely which lines are wrong now. J |