[Valgrind-users] Concerning cg_annotation not working

[Felipe A. <fel...@gm...>]

Oops, math mistake :P

I just finished my work. Thank you to both of you who helped me.

Regards~

2008/6/12 Hien Le <Hi...@me...>:

There were 115773 instruction refs total, of which 611 references were I1
> misses.  661 / 115773 = 0.52%.
>
>
>  Thanks once again!
>>
>> Now, in the end of the test, I have to analize all the data collected and
>> I
>> found another barrier for succeeding in such task.
>>
>> I couldn't figure out how the miss rates work, because if there were
>> 115773
>> references on I, no way 611 is 0.52%, it should  be 1.89%, same goes for
>> all
>> the others miss rates. Am I missing something?
>> ==6464== I   refs:      115,773
>> ==6464== I1  misses:        611
>> ==6464== L2i misses:        609
>> ==6464== I1  miss rate:    0.52%          *-> this should be 1,89%, isn't
>> it? x=115773/(611*100)*
>> ==6464== L2i miss rate:    0.52%
>> ==6464==
>> ==6464== D   refs:       57,878  (41,851 rd   + 16,027 wr)
>> ==6464== D1  misses:      1,063  (   899 rd   +    164 wr)
>> ==6464== L2d misses:        977  (   821 rd   +    156 wr)
>> ==6464== D1  miss rate:     1.8% (   2.1%     +    1.0%  )
>> ==6464== L2d miss rate:     1.6% (   1.9%     +    0.9%  )
>> ==6464==
>> ==6464== L2 refs:         1,674  ( 1,510 rd   +    164 wr)
>> ==6464== L2 misses:       1,586  ( 1,430 rd   +    156 wr)
>> ==6464== L2 miss rate:      0.9% (   0.9%     +    0.9%  )
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>


-- 
Felipe



-- 
Felipe