|
From: Bart V. A. <bar...@gm...> - 2008-03-02 12:09:01
|
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 3:30 PM, Julian Seward <js...@ac...> wrote: > On Friday 23 November 2007 14:27, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: > > >> If anybody can figure out why the PDF doc build fails on > > >> openSUSE 10.2 and later, that would be great. > > > > Who is guilty, xsltproc or pdfxmltex? > > Does xsltproc produce the same index.fo on these two systems? > > If you have the time to chase this around, that would be great :-) A quote from "DocBook XSL: The Complete Guide" (http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/FOprocessors.html): PassiveTeX from Sebastian Rahtz (http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/) is a free XSL-FO processor based on TeX. It has fallen behind in its implementation of the XSL-FO specification, and many features of DocBook XSL do not work in PassiveTeX. Not recommended. As far as I know PassiveTeX was last updated in March 2004. Does anyone have a suggestion for a replacement for PassiveTex ? Bart. |