|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2007-11-17 00:13:41
|
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Josef Weidendorfer wrote: > I am not really settled about "--out-file". I just think that options for > similar functions in different tools should show some consistency. > So I am really fine with an option "--<toolname>-out-file=..." with support > for patterns (like %p). > > So I would change the according callgrind option to "--callgrind-out-file=...", > independent of the fact that callgrind could produce further files with > additional suffix. > > Is this OK? That sounds ok. In summary: --log-file=<pattern> --cachegrind-out-file=<pattern> --massif-out-file=<pattern> --callgrind-out-file=<pattern> The latter could also be --callgrind-out-prefix, but I'm ok with --callgrind-out-file. We could also shorten the options names, eg. --cg-out-file, but I'm not too fussed about that. Nick |