|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2007-10-29 20:48:01
|
Author: sewardj Date: 2007-10-29 20:48:01 +0000 (Mon, 29 Oct 2007) New Revision: 7051 Log: Hmm, I thought this had been committed in r6933. Strange. Added: branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp Added: branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp =================================================================== --- branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp (rev 0) +++ branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp 2007-10-29 20:48:01 UTC (rev 7051) @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ + +Thread #6 was created + at 0x........: clone (in /...libc...) + by 0x........: ... + by 0x........: pthread_create@GLIBC_ (in /lib/libpthread...) + by 0x........: pthread_create@* (tc_intercepts.c:...) + by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34) + +Thread #6: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated + at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (tc_intercepts.c:...) + by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19) + by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (tc_intercepts.c:...) + by 0x........: ... + by 0x........: ... + +ERROR SUMMARY: 1000 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) |