|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2007-10-05 10:16:47
|
> alternatively we could encode "%t" as "%.s". this is an apparently > non-sensical construct (print zero characters of the string) that we could > overload with this meaning. I prefer that; doing a lot of xml_quote everywhere is hassle. gcc will not complain about "%.s" ? At the end of this it would be good to put in a comment somewhere, a short description of the nonstandard format extensions we now support. |