|
From: Dirk M. <dm...@gm...> - 2007-10-05 10:09:37
|
On Friday, 5. October 2007, Dirk Mueller wrote: > sure, I'm more wondering what to do with "%t". in valgrind ,this is an > XML-escaped "%s", while for printf its a length modifier, which causes > quite some warnings. > > do we aim for thread safety? otherwise a xml_quote() around the argument > sounds like the easiest solution for me. alternatively we could encode "%t" as "%.s". this is an apparently non-sensical construct (print zero characters of the string) that we could overload with this meaning. Dirk |