|
From: <sv...@va...> - 2007-09-20 14:26:50
|
Author: sewardj
Date: 2007-09-20 15:26:47 +0100 (Thu, 20 Sep 2007)
New Revision: 6873
Log:
Update expected output.
Modified:
branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc10_rec_lock.stderr.exp
Modified: branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc10_rec_lock.stderr.exp
===================================================================
--- branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc10_rec_lock.stderr.exp 2007-09-20 10:27:37 UTC (rev 6872)
+++ branches/THRCHECK/thrcheck/tests/tc10_rec_lock.stderr.exp 2007-09-20 14:26:47 UTC (rev 6873)
@@ -10,16 +10,16 @@
Thread #1 unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (tc_intercepts.c:423)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc10_rec_lock.c:39)
- by 0x........: main (tc10_rec_lock.c:44)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc10_rec_lock.c:53)
+ by 0x........: main (tc10_rec_lock.c:58)
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (tc_intercepts.c:299)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc10_rec_lock.c:21)
- by 0x........: main (tc10_rec_lock.c:44)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc10_rec_lock.c:35)
+ by 0x........: main (tc10_rec_lock.c:58)
Thread #1's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed with error 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (tc_intercepts.c:432)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc10_rec_lock.c:39)
- by 0x........: main (tc10_rec_lock.c:44)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc10_rec_lock.c:53)
+ by 0x........: main (tc10_rec_lock.c:58)
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
|