From: Ashley P. <as...@qu...> - 2007-03-30 10:45:33
|
Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Friday, 30. March 2007, Ashley Pittman wrote: > >> Can you? As it's a function wrapper isn't it run in the client address >> space and and therefore currently unsuppressable? This may have changed >> without me noticing though. > > Just because it is run in the client it is suppressable (?). In any case > created a suppression to test this behaviour and it worked fine for me. Errors that originate from client requests are reported as "Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request" and I don't think these can be suppressed currently, it should be fairly easy to add however. The other slightly annoying thing about them is that they don't report the base or the length of the client request. Ashley, |