|
From:
<a.g...@st...> - 2007-03-20 17:34:27
|
I think there are quite more broken functions there. I will fix all i =20= can (basically all i use and can test that's well fixed) and then =20 submit the diff. (If you want the diff just for that function for =20 now, just ask and i'll send it). Alberto El 20/03/2007, a las 18:08, Julian Seward escribi=F3: > >> The problem is that it only returns the correct segment if the text >> segment >> overlaps the other segments, wich is quite unusual. I have =20 >> replaced the >> functions for this and everything seems to work ok on Ubuntu 6.10: > > Um, yes. (!) My first reaction to the existing implementation is > that it is completely broken. Can you send a diff (svn diff -rHEAD > coregrind/m_debuginfo/debuginfo.c) ? Thanks. > > J |