|
From: Oswald B. <os...@kd...> - 2006-09-02 07:22:09
|
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 03:18:56AM +0100, Julian Seward wrote: > Recording program counters without a stack is of limited use, but I > can't see how to record a complete stack for each first-write without > huge space/time overheads. It might be possible to devise a highly > compressed representation for just the PC values, based on the idea > that each segment is only going to use a tiny subset of the 2^32/2^64 > possible PC values. > i think saving traces in a tree might work. sounds a bit like callgrind. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. |