|
From: Robert W. <rj...@du...> - 2006-02-10 02:02:59
|
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 00:27 +0000, Julian Seward wrote: > Robert, > > Apologies for delayed reply. > > > Before I left for my conference, I did a hack fix that moved both nested > > functions out and passed in pointers to any variables they modified. It > > compiled and no extra tests failed, but as I said, it was hacky. Patch is > > attached. If you're all OK with it, I'll commit it. > > It looks ok to me. My only reservation is - have you been able to > run tests to verify that said functionality still works post change? Well, all the current test suite still runs with no changes. Now whether that means the functionality is still being tested, I honestly can't say. |