|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2005-11-16 16:06:08
|
In message <200...@ac...>
Julian Seward <js...@ac...> wrote:
> To follow up:
>
>> - should we be creating a bss segment which is executable as well as
>> r/w-able?
>
> In fact it's the data segment, which with the new aspacemgr was being
> given permissions rw-, whereas natively it's rwx. So that's an
> (easily fixable) bug.
How is that happening then? mapelf in m_ume.c looks like it respects
the permissions given by the PT_LOAD entries in the PHdr.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://www.compton.nu/
|