From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2005-09-30 15:15:48
|
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Julian Seward wrote: > Ehm .. could we not just use ULong? We know that's reliably 64 bits; > LOffT gives another type for which to remember the meaning and it > took me long enough to get my head around SizeT, OffT, Addr, Word > all being word-sized things. > > Alternatively .. if you really want to have a new type .. could we > call it Off64T, to be more in accordance with eg Addr/Addr32/Addr64 > conventions? I find the 'long' qualifier ambiguous (one long means "word > sized", which isn't what you mean here) and try to avoid it as much as > possible. Off64T is good, the kernel has off64_t also. N |