Re: [Valgrind-developers] branch backports?

[Tom H. <to...@co...>]

In message <Pin...@ch...>
          Nicholas Nethercote <nj...@cs...> wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Julian Seward wrote:
> 
> >> My only concern is that it would be good to have an official tracking
> >> mechanism for which changes have been backported and which are
> >> outstanding.
> >
> > So I made this file 3_0_BUGSTATUS.txt which I hoped would be at
> > least a step in that direction.  I do want to keep careful track
> > of what the bug status is and what's outstanding.
> 
> Hmm, I think using SVN rather than CVS is a huge win here, because we can
> refer to individual bugfixes with a single revision number, ie. have a
> list of "to be merged" revisions.

That's partly why I started noting the SVN revision for a fix when
closing bugs, and likewise with the bug number in the SVN log.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://www.compton.nu/