|
From: Paul P. <ppl...@gm...> - 2005-08-03 15:26:25
|
On 8/3/05, Nicholas Nethercote <nj...@cs...> wrote:
> > Warning: zero-sized CIE/FDE but not at section end in DWARF2 CFI readi=
ng
>=20
> Julian fixed that, too.
The new regtest results from that system:
=3D=3D 159 tests, 8 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
memcheck/tests/leakotron (stdout)
memcheck/tests/pointer-trace (stderr)
memcheck/tests/sigprocmask (stderr)
memcheck/tests/strchr (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vgtest_ume (stderr)
memcheck/tests/weirdioctl (stderr)
memcheck/tests/xml1 (stderr)
none/tests/faultstatus (stderr)
none/tests/fdleak_fcntl (stderr)
The "interesting" diffs are:
*** vgtest_ume.stderr.exp 2005-07-02 15:43:03.000000000 -0700
--- vgtest_ume.stderr.out 2005-08-03 07:41:05.000000000 -0700
***************
*** 4 ****
! Hello, world!
--- 4,5 ----
! Warning: client syscall mmap2 tried to modify addresses 0x........-0x....=
....
! valgrind: mmap(0x........, 4096) failed in UME.
*** weirdioctl.stderr.exp 2005-07-02 15:42:58.000000000 -0700
--- weirdioctl.stderr.out 2005-08-03 07:41:06.000000000 -0700
***************
*** 3,4 ****
! by 0x........: __libc_start_main (in /...libc...)
! by 0x........: ...
--- 3,8 ----
! by 0x........: main (weirdioctl.c:28)
! Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
!=20
! Syscall param ioctl(TCSET{A,AW,AF}) points to uninitialised byte(s)
! at 0x........: ioctl (in /...libc...)
! by 0x........: main (weirdioctl.c:43)
*** xml1.stderr.exp64 2005-08-03 07:33:52.000000000 -0700
--- xml1.stderr.out 2005-08-03 07:41:09.000000000 -0700
***************
*** 353,364 ****
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <fn>__libc_start_main</fn>
- </frame>
- <frame>
- <ip>0x........</ip>
- <obj>...</obj>
- <dir>...</dir>
- <file>start.S</file>
- <line>...</line>
- </frame>
--- 352 ----
*** faultstatus.stderr.exp 2005-07-02 15:43:44.000000000 -0700
--- faultstatus.stderr.out 2005-08-03 07:41:37.000000000 -0700
***************
*** 6,12 ****
- Test 5: PASS
- Test 6: PASS
- Test 7: PASS
- Test 8: PASS
- Test 9: disInstr: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x........ 0x........
0x........ 0x........
- at 0x........: test9 (faultstatus.c:127)
- FAIL: expected signal 11, not 4
--- 5 ----
(Looks like new faultstatus.stderr.exp64 is needed for that last one).
Cheers,
|