Re: [Valgrind-developers] Callgrind status

[Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...>]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Tom Hughes wrote:

>> The code in m_aspacemgr.c:VG_(setup_pointercheck)() makes it look like
>> it's doing something on x86.
>
> The segment limits are setup yes, but as VEX won't put a segment
> prefix on any of the loads or stores it does that won't have any
> effect will it?

Oh yes, I think you're right.

N