|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2005-07-20 13:42:45
|
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tom Hughes wrote: >> Well spotted; but (mystified) the implication is that the amd64 >> arg order for __NR_clone is different from what it is on x86 ? >> Is that right? > > Yes - I checked the kernel source for both. I nearly changed the x86 > one as well but then I check the kernel source and realised it was > actually the comment in that assembly code that was wrong for x86. > > I think on x86 they are in the order they were added in but for amd64 > they took the opportunity to order them more logically. Did you add a comment in the AMD64 code explaining the different order to x86? N |