|
From: Cerion Armour-B. <ce...@op...> - 2005-06-08 19:37:38
|
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 09:27, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > i think this order is suboptimal. the log should come before the > modifications list - otherwise you have to scroll too much if you only > want to skim over the changes. Updated post-commit script to put log first. On Wednesday 08 June 2005 19:20, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:14:08PM -0500, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > > >another note ... the logs of several reorganizations did not indicate > > >that svn copy/move was used > > > > it seems that the way Subversion represents these in the diffs is a > > bit confusing -- it does make it look a lot like you removed and then > > re-added the file under the new name. > > that's normal. the post-commit script can indicate the source of an add, > though - the kde scripts do it nicely (of course ;). Any chance of a peek at kde's scripts? Cheers, Cerion |