|
From: Oswald B. <os...@kd...> - 2005-06-08 17:20:11
|
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:14:08PM -0500, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > >another note ... the logs of several reorganizations did not indicate > >that svn copy/move was used > > it seems that the way Subversion represents these in the diffs is a > bit confusing -- it does make it look a lot like you removed and then > re-added the file under the new name. > that's normal. the post-commit script can indicate the source of an add, though - the kde scripts do it nicely (of course ;). -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. |