|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2005-06-08 17:14:21
|
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > i think this order is suboptimal. the log should come before the > modifications list - otherwise you have to scroll too much if you only > want to skim over the changes. Soudns good to me. > another note ... the logs of several reorganizations did not indicate > that svn copy/move was used - is this because the post-commit script did > not show it, or because it was not used, indeed? We're using it, it seems that the way Subversion represents these in the diffs is a bit confusing -- it does make it look a lot like you removed and then re-added the file under the new name. N |