[Valgrind-users] valgrind ends with SIGSEGV in open_path - invalid address in lib/ld-2.3.4.so

[Chris M. <cma...@ya...>]

I'm trying to valgrind a process, but I get a segv in open_path.  Can anyone help?
   
  Thanks,
  Chris
   
  ==29247== Memcheck, a memory error detector.
==29247== Copyright (C) 2002-2007, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==29247== Using LibVEX rev 1732, a library for dynamic binary translation.
==29247== Copyright (C) 2004-2007, and GNU GPL'd, by OpenWorks LLP.
==29247== Using valgrind-3.2.3, a dynamic binary instrumentation framework.
==29247== Copyright (C) 2000-2007, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==29247==
--29247-- Command line
--29247--    ./debug/bin/RTPriceService
--29247--    -c
--29247--    config/rtpriceservice.xml
--29247--    -f
--29247-- Startup, with flags:
--29247--    -v
--29247-- Contents of /proc/version:
--29247--   Linux version 2.6.9-34.ELsmp (bhc...@hs...) (gcc version 3.4.5 20051201 (Red Hat 3.4.5-2)) #1 SMP Fri Feb 24 16:54:53 EST 2006
--29247-- Arch and hwcaps: X86, x86-sse1-sse2
--29247-- Page sizes: currently 4096, max supported 4096
--29247-- Valgrind library directory: /home/masiech/lib/valgrind
--29247-- Reading syms from /lib/ld-2.3.4.so (0x4000000)
--29247-- Reading syms from /data/home/masiech/perforce/depot/branches/masiech/pricing/CoreServices/RTPricing/cpp/install/debug/bin/RTPriceService (0x8048000)
--29247-- Reading syms from /data/home/masiech/lib/valgrind/x86-linux/memcheck (0x38000000)
--29247--    object doesn't have a dynamic symbol table
--29247-- Reading suppressions file: /home/masiech/lib/valgrind/default.supp
--29247-- REDIR: 0x4011F70 (index) redirected to 0x380220BB (vgPlain_x86_linux_REDIR_FOR_index)
--29247-- Reading syms from /data/home/masiech/lib/valgrind/x86-linux/vgpreload_core.so (0x4018000)
--29247-- Reading syms from /data/home/masiech/lib/valgrind/x86-linux/vgpreload_memcheck.so (0x401A000)
==29247== WARNING: new redirection conflicts with existing -- ignoring it
--29247--     new: 0x04011F70 (index     ) R-> 0x0401D134 index
--29247-- REDIR: 0x4012110 (strlen) redirected to 0x401D378 (strlen)
==29247== Invalid write of size 4
==29247==    at 0x40124CC: mempcpy (in /lib/ld-2.3.4.so)
==29247==  Address 0xBEF4CFFF is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==29247==
==29247== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==29247==  Access not within mapped region at address 0xBEF4D000
==29247==    at 0x40124CC: mempcpy (in /lib/ld-2.3.4.so)
==29247==
==29247== Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
==29247==    at 0x246: ???
==29247==    by 0x4006AAA: open_path (in /lib/ld-2.3.4.so)
==29247==  Address 0x246 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==29247==
==29247== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==29247==  Bad permissions for mapped region at address 0x246
==29247==    at 0x246: ???
==29247==    by 0x4006AAA: open_path (in /lib/ld-2.3.4.so)
==29247==
==29247== ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 2 from 1)
==29247==
==29247== 1 errors in context 1 of 2:
==29247== Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
==29247==    at 0x246: ???
==29247==    by 0x4006AAA: open_path (in /lib/ld-2.3.4.so)
==29247==  Address 0x246 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==29247==
==29247== 1 errors in context 2 of 2:
==29247== Invalid write of size 4
==29247==    at 0x40124CC: mempcpy (in /lib/ld-2.3.4.so)
==29247==  Address 0xBEF4CFFF is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
--29247--
--29247-- supp:    2 Ubuntu-stripped-ld.so
==29247==
==29247== IN SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 2 from 1)
==29247==
==29247== malloc/free: in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==29247== malloc/free: 0 allocs, 0 frees, 0 bytes allocated.
==29247==
==29247== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible.
--29247--  memcheck: sanity checks: 0 cheap, 1 expensive
--29247--  memcheck: auxmaps: 0 auxmap entries (0k, 0M) in use
--29247--  memcheck: auxmaps: 0 searches, 0 comparisons
--29247--  memcheck: SMs: n_issued      = 5 (80k, 0M)
--29247--  memcheck: SMs: n_deissued    = 0 (0k, 0M)
--29247--  memcheck: SMs: max_noaccess  = 65535 (1048560k, 1023M)
--29247--  memcheck: SMs: max_undefined = 0 (0k, 0M)
--29247--  memcheck: SMs: max_defined   = 1 (16k, 0M)
--29247--  memcheck: SMs: max_non_DSM   = 5 (80k, 0M)
--29247--  memcheck: max sec V bit nodes:    0 (0k, 0M)
--29247--  memcheck: set_sec_vbits8 calls: 0 (new: 0, updates: 0)
--29247--  memcheck: max shadow mem size:   384k, 0M
--29247-- translate:            fast SP updates identified: 393 ( 88.3%)
--29247-- translate:   generic_known SP updates identified: 29 (  6.5%)
--29247-- translate: generic_unknown SP updates identified: 23 (  5.1%)
--29247--     tt/tc: 1,372 tt lookups requiring 1,377 probes
--29247--     tt/tc: 1,371 fast-cache updates, 4 flushes
--29247--  transtab: new        637 (14,365 -> 232,503; ratio 161:10) [0 scs]
--29247--  transtab: dumped     0 (0 -> ??)
--29247--  transtab: discarded  12 (295 -> ??)
--29247-- scheduler: 4,904 jumps (bb entries).
--29247-- scheduler: 0/753 major/minor sched events.
--29247--    sanity: 1 cheap, 1 expensive checks.
--29247--    exectx: 30,011 lists, 4 contexts (avg 0 per list)
--29247--    exectx: 4 searches, 0 full compares (0 per 1000)
--29247--    exectx: 0 cmp2, 2 cmp4, 0 cmpAll
Segmentation fault


 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com