|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2006-10-19 10:16:46
|
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Pim Nijdam wrote: > Yes you're right Tom. My fallacy was the folowing: I reasoned that as > soon as the current running thread would write to the pipe another > thread would be scheduled. But of course the scheduler may choose to > continue running the current running thread, enabling it to reclaim > Valgrinds lock. Yes, that's how it works with single-threaded programs :) Nick> |