|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2006-09-20 23:29:27
|
Hmm. 2.6.16 isn't exactly what you'd call an ancient and buggy kernel. But .. [thinks] isn't this a red herring? If 3.2.0 does not fail on your box when running your Fortran app but 3.2.1 does, then it has to be a regression in 3.2.1. That's what you're saying happened, right? Hmm. J On Thursday 21 September 2006 00:24, Catherine Moroney wrote: > Here's my kernel version number: > > cm...@si...:/data/L2TC/cmm/stereo_special_runs/larry > [80]>uname -rv > 2.6.16-1.2096_FC5 #1 SMP Wed Apr 19 05:14:26 EDT 2006 > > Catherine > > On Sep 20, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Julian Seward wrote: > >>> Are you doing something strange with floating point rounding, or > >>> other IEEE control word stuff (precision, exception handling) ? > >> > >> We've been seeing it on amd64 machines - see my postings on the > >> developer list a few months ago for details. > >> > >> What I see is the FPU control word changing precision from 64 bit > >> to 80 bit if I recall correctly. I'm pretty sure it's a kernel > >> bug though > > > > Ah, well remembered. Now you point it out that does sound vaguely > > familiar. > > > > Catherine, what kernel version are you using? It would be interesting > > to know if it's in the same ballpark as the ones Tom saw this > > problem on. > > > > J |