|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2005-03-30 18:14:53
|
> Yup. I'm working on it now. Did we ever reach a decision on whether > to drop routines from vg_mylibc that become simple veneers over a > single KAL routine? I think we should -- that is, there's no point in calling into mylibc if that then calls onwards to KAL and does nothing else. In other words mylibc becomes more or less split into two parts: KAL for dealing with the kernel, and whatever is left over in mylibc, which is presumably vanilla stuff like strlen etc. Does that sound sensible? J |