|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2005-03-30 16:29:19
|
In message <200...@ac...>
Julian Seward <js...@ac...> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 16:15, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
>
> > If nothing else, the kal_* functions may as well be called
> > VG_(getpid)(), etc, rather than either changing all the callers or
> > having a file full of stub functions.
>
> No ... I prefer to keep the kal_ prefix. It isn't intrusive and
> it avoids the burden of having to remember whether VG_(obscure_foo)
> is a Kal function or not. In the same way that all the POSIX
> pthreads functions and types are trivially identifiable from their
> names.
The other option of course is a new VGK_() or VGKAL_() prefix.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://www.compton.nu/
|