|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2005-03-17 17:51:17
|
On Thursday 17 March 2005 17:24, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> I'd prefer not to ship 2.4.0 with this bug in, if we can resolve it > >> relatively quickly. What else can I do to help you repro it? > > > > This doesn't strike me as a showstopper bug: it seems easy to work > > around (you can just ^C the process, yes?), it doesn't crash and it > > doesn't seem to be affecting many people. > > Does it preclude leak checking OOo? No, you can do control-C and then it moves onto leak checking. Still, it's a bit disconcerting. J |