|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2005-03-17 17:25:38
|
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> I'd prefer not to ship 2.4.0 with this bug in, if we can resolve it >> relatively quickly. What else can I do to help you repro it? >> > This doesn't strike me as a showstopper bug: it seems easy to work > around (you can just ^C the process, yes?), it doesn't crash and it > doesn't seem to be affecting many people. Does it preclude leak checking OOo? N |