|
From: Jeremy F. <je...@go...> - 2005-02-24 01:30:24
|
Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> Sounds good in principle. How complex is it, how much code has been
> added?
Very little. It isn't much more complex than the original checker.
Patch attached; there's about 20 lines more code. This doesn't have the
full clique-grouping algorithm, which will add a bit more code (probably
<100 lines though).
J
|