|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2005-02-17 03:23:42
|
Hi, I've been removing some old junk from the code base. Here's some things I wasn't sure about removing: - FAQ 3.4 -- is that still needed? - README_PACKAGERS -- the stuff about stripping, is that still true/correct? - vg_intercepts.c -- does that still need to be generated from vg_intercept.c.base? I don't think so. Correspondingly, I think that comment about the "gory details" is no longer true. Does vg_replace_malloc.c still need this preprocessing, and the use of VG_INTERCEPT? (I really don't understand all that stuff, still.) - Section 2.8 of the manual talks about support for threads. It's out of date, I think it should be nuked. Anyone disagree? - I thought VG_USERREQ__MALLOC and all its associates (eg. VG_(sk_malloc_called_by_scheduler)) could be removed, but Jeremy, you've just started using them again in your latest commit. That's a shame, they're ugly. N |