|
From: Jeremy F. <je...@go...> - 2005-02-15 01:53:05
|
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 17:31 -0800, Robert Walsh wrote: > On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 17:21 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > That would become mandatory with the superblock scheme, since we could > > never rely on being able to mmap more than 64M. > > Really? So what about an application that mmaps, say, a big chunk > (>64M) of a database into memory? No, I mean internal to Valgrind. We could allocate multiple superblock chunks and hope they're contiguous, but it would seem a bit rude (since that denies them to the client). J |