|
From: John R. <jr...@Bi...> - 2006-03-08 05:52:08
|
Beorn Johnson wrote: >>So, it seems there are some subtleties here that aren't obvious. > I am mearly looking for some hints/guidance as > to why the implementation of sys_tkill is sufficiently > complicated that it's commented out, and maybe even > what might have to be done to get something that > works. Valgrind's internal model of threads is [was] not isomorphic to the model used by the Linux kernel+glibc. There are control, scheduling, and "multiplexing" issues. Also, there is the problem that Linux has [had] two models: (old) linuxthreads and (new) nptl. A different product, such as Insure++, may work sooner. -- |