|
From: Jeremy F. <je...@go...> - 2005-02-11 08:45:47
|
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 02:20 -0500, Greg Parker wrote: > That sounds reasonable. Is the recent libpthread removal mostly > working? I want to start from a base that includes that, but my > changes will involve lots of code motion between files so running > `cvs update` won't be practical for long. If the libpthread changes > mostly work now, then I'll just grab a version now and ignore > further changes to top-of-tree. CVS HEAD is looking pretty solid. I'm working on restoring the lost pthread checking, but that should be pretty localized. Once that's in, it will be released as 2.4. J |