|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2005-01-17 15:05:40
|
In message <1105952911.31917.57.camel@localhost>
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <je...@go...> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 08:44 +0000, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
>> >> memcheck/tests/scalar (stderr)
>>
>> This is asserting on the munlockall test:
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> 153: __NR_munlockall 0s 0m
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> scalar: scalar.c:671: main: Assertion `-1 != res' failed.
>
> What's to fail? Or is the kernel missing munlockall altogether?
The munlockall is failing with EPERM on RH72 through RH9 by the
looks of it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (th...@cy...)
Software Engineer, Cyberscience Corporation
http://www.cyberscience.com/
|