|
From: Eyal L. <ey...@ey...> - 2005-01-17 08:45:11
|
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 17:20 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >>Currently, when the sys_clone wrapper sees a clone() which is actually a >>fork, it ends up using the fork() syscall instead. However, this >>doesn't do the extra things that clone() can do, like writing the parent >>and/or child pid into memory, which is what this assert checks for. > > OK, I just checked in a fix for this, so give it a go. It works, thanks! The tests last many hours, but if I still see any funnies I will report back. -- Eyal Lebedinsky (ey...@ey...) <http://samba.org/eyal/> If attaching .zip rename to .dat |