|
From: Oswald B. <os...@kd...> - 2005-09-11 21:29:39
|
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:58:29AM -0700, Robert Walsh wrote: > > I'm interested both in whether this is fundamentally possible, and an > > idea of what things would need to be done to actually implement it. > > I don't think this is possible. Valgrind creates a lot of state that > wouldn't be around if it started half-way through the program > (e.g. memory validity information.) > valgrind != memcheck. "attachabliity" might well be achievable for tools that don't preclude it inherently. probably it depends on how flexible the new memory manager will be in that regard. but then, i have no idea what i'm talking about ... :) -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. |