|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2005-08-12 11:06:52
|
In message <200...@ge...>
Christian Parpart <tr...@ge...> wrote:
> On Friday 12 August 2005 12:14, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
>> Well that trace looks fairly straightforward to me - there is some
>> code in that release method that is accessing memory that was part
>> of the plugin and has been released. Presumably a global object given
>> that the memory being referenced is part of the .so rather than being
>> on the stack or the heap.
>
> That might be a hint there; thanks;
>
> is it also possible, that this ill address is once been valid and created by
> the plugin and that their new/malloc method did return an address within its
> own mmap space?
I don't see how, no. Any memory from new/malloc would come from a swap
backed anonymous mapping not a mapping of a .so file.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
http://www.compton.nu/
|