|
From: <Woe...@on...> - 2005-08-07 20:15:46
|
On Sunday 07 August 2005 18:23, Tom Hughes wrote: > > Your patch is only correct if VG_(printf) uses the same format > > characters as printf and with the exact same meaning. I'm not sure > > that is necessarily true as VG_(printf) uses it's own formatter > > so I would have to check if they do match fully. > > It looks like VG_(printf) is a superset of printf - the %t format > is extra and there are extra flags (command and open parenthesis). Is there another way to catch wrong format strings? Andr=E9 |