|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2004-09-02 11:19:23
|
> I can imagine pathological cases, under my proposal, where the client is > already very big and so V cannot find that space (ie. your "at least" > assumption fails). In those cases having incremental debug info loading > (ie. not mapping in the whole file at once) would help. However, these > cases are so unlikely that just reading in the whole file at once (which > is much simpler) should be fine. Good. I can imagine that too. So we are of common understanding. Assuming the plan goes through as proposed, I'm going to assume the debug info reading issue is a non-problem. > It might be worth me doing a summary of this thread at some point, like I > did for the threads/signals/syscalls discussion, in order to clear up any > remaining confusion and clarify our terminology. Good plan. J |