|
From: David F. <dav...@bl...> - 2005-07-23 16:25:44
|
how about" "read of 8 bytes at 0x5678 goes past allocation boundary" "allocation is 22 bytes long starting at 0x1234" -david Christian Parpart wrote: > On Friday 22 July 2005 12:44, Dennis Lubert wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Hm, I really dont understand the problem with the current format. Valgrind >> displays the occurence and failure (in this case an invalid read) >> > > "invalid read" shall be maybe replaced by "invalid read of %d bytes outside > reserved block" or so. > > However, these messages shall -for sure- be somehow simplified, here I agree > with bartoschek. > > Regards, > Christian Parpart. > > |