|
From: Nicholas N. <nj...@cs...> - 2005-05-19 13:51:28
|
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Julian Seward wrote: >> The good thing is that the checksum doesn't need to be very good, since >> false collisions will only cause extra translations to be executed. >> Something incredibly simple like adding up each byte of code (modulo 256) >> might be good enough. > > Are you sure? If the checksum concludes incorrectly that the new code > is the same as the old code, then we are hosed :-) Hmm, yes, ignore me. N |