|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2005-05-06 17:15:34
|
Jeroen Thanks for that. We are slowly working to make the regression test system more robust, so that it produces more repeatable results across a wider range of linux distros. And, of course, fix any genuine errors it throws up. On my SuSE 9.1 box I now get: == 172 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures ================= none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) none/tests/x86/int (stderr) (vex r1168, valgrind r3625) Could you send me the relevant .stderr.diff and .stdout.diff files for the failures you mention? Also, if you wanted to continue to track the failure rate, that would be very useful. Currently the nightly builds on my base machine "phoenix ( SuSE 9.1 )" are for 2.4.0; I will change this over to auto-build the 3 line instead. As the regtest system becomes more robust I would hope that results on all x86-linux distros converge. J > == 173 tests, 7 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure ================= > memcheck/tests/leak-tree (stderr) > memcheck/tests/writev (stderr) > memcheck/tests/x86/scalar (stderr) > corecheck/tests/fdleak_fcntl (stderr) > none/tests/faultstatus (stderr) > none/tests/tls (stdout) > none/tests/tls (stderr) > none/tests/x86/int (stderr) |